Analysis of Significantly Different Bacteria. by Xu Jia (187142)

Most significant muscle activation values. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

Subjects:

Participant demographics for all participants included in analysis. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

Subjects:

Publication bias of the risk of all groups. by Juan Gu (288925)

“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I² ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”

Summary of risk of bias. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

Subjects:

Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”

All measurement data obtained for this study. by Brendan M. Anderson (11234356)

Subjects:

Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”

The pooled effect of all-cause mortality rate in non-health care workers and health care workers. by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

Subjects:

Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”

Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

iKIR score decreases protection associated with protective class II genotypes in T1D. by Laura Mora-Bitria (20477525)

Raw data for all figures and supporting information. by Hiroki Hamaguchi (22783780)

Subjects:

Arctigenin decreased proliferation in colorectal cancer cells with no significant effect on normal cells. by Xiang-Fan Chen (13932983)

Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO₂ laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”

Schematic diagram of experimental injector size. by Lei Bai (631944)

Subjects:

Histograms of (A) distance measured in meters to nearest neighboring tree given bin widths of 2 m (<i>n</i> = 44), and (B) basal areas of all sampled trees (<i>n</i> = 58; bin widt... by Alexandra M. Campbell (3284094)

Subjects:

Species counts for all trap (kubben) catches across sites and seasons. by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

Subjects:

Species counts per catch for all fyke catches across sites and seasons. by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

Subjects: