Search alternatives:
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
Grade system.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
103
Literature search.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
104
Study characteristics.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
105
Flowchart of literature retrieval.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
106
Data extraction.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
107
Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool.
Published 2025“…Regarding COVID-19 severity, no significant difference were found for asymptomatic (pooled RR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.81–1.72), mild to moderate (pooled RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.84–1.17), severe COVID-19 (pooled RR 1.25; 95%CI: 0.92–1.70), hospitalization (pooled RR 0.93; 95%CI: 0.58–1.50) or all-cause mortality (pooled RR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.18–1.95) between BCG and placebo groups. …”
-
108
-
109
-
110
Lipidomic analysis of epidermis using LC-IMS-CID-MS reveals major changes in CKO// epidermis.
Published 2025“…(E) Dendrogram showing all 247 significantly changed lipids in CKO epidermis. …”
-
111
-
112
-
113
Sampling locations for banana aphids.
Published 2024“…Four isolates (BIITAC6.2.2, BIITAC10.3.3, BIITAC8.1.5, and MIITAC6.2.2) were highly pathogenic, causing greater than 75% aphid mortality in all populations. A significant decrease in aphid fecundity was observed with BIITAC6.2.2, MIITAC6.2.2, and BIITAC10.3.3. …”
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
Side angle tea picking.
Published 2025“…The experimental results demonstrate that when compared to YOLOv10, S-YOLOv10-ASI shows significant improvements across various metrics. Specifically, Bounding Box Regression Loss decreases by over 30% in the training set, while Classification Loss and Bounding Box Regression Loss drop by more than 60% in the validation set. …”
-
118
-
119
-
120