Search alternatives:
significant application » significant applications (Expand Search), significant implications (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
application groups » application rates (Expand Search), application scope (Expand Search), validation groups (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant application » significant applications (Expand Search), significant implications (Expand Search), significant association (Expand Search)
application groups » application rates (Expand Search), application scope (Expand Search), validation groups (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
The characteristics of patient groups were used to prove the method’s applicability.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
A graph showing risk of bias and applicability concerns among included studies.
Published 2023Subjects: -
10
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Items showing significant score differences among different performance groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
-
20