Showing 1 - 20 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant attention decrease ) OR ( significant ((gap decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  17. 17

    EMA attention mechanism working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, Parameters and GFLOPs were reduced by 10.0% and 23.2%, respectively, indicating a significant enhancement in detection accuracy along with a substantial decrease in both parameters and computational costs. …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20