Search alternatives:
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
attention increases » retention increased (Expand Search), activation increases (Expand Search), infection increases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
attention increases » retention increased (Expand Search), activation increases (Expand Search), infection increases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Plant growth, nodulation, and N content as affected by manipulating of GmNN1/FT2a.
Published 2022Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
16
-
17
Phenotype and molecular identification of <i>GmNN1/FT2a</i> in stable transgenic soybean plants.
Published 2022Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20