Search alternatives:
significant base » significant based (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
base case » use case (Expand Search)
significant base » significant based (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
base case » use case (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Base-case analysis.
Published 2025“…At a CET of 0.51 times GDP per capita (US$6,394.536), the base-case analysis showed that the incremental costs of AOM relative to PP1M after 10 years of treatment were US$1,926.373 with an incremental gain of 0.306 QALYs. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
The base case analysis.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the base-case scenario, adding benmelstobart and anlotinib to chemotherapy increased QALYs by 0.34 at an additional cost of $24,684.07, yielding an ICER of $71,559.84 per QALY. …”
-
15
Base-case results.
Published 2025“…One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model results,</p><p>Results</p><p>In base-case analysis, compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, ITH-testing directed therapy could bring additional 0.14 QALYs and 0.29 QALYs, with marginal costs of $3750.75 and $7778.18, resulting in the ICER of $27,353.27/QALY and $26,461.46/QALY, respectively, which lower than the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. …”
-
16
Base-case results.
Published 2024“…The model time-frame was one-year. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. …”
-
17
Base-case analysis.
Published 2023“…The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at US$50,000 per QALY gained. In the base-case analysis, HTLV-1 antenatal screening (US$76.85, 24.94766 QALYs, 24.94813 LYs, ICER; US$40,100 per QALY gained) was cost-effective compared with no screening (US$2.18, 24.94580 QALYs, 24.94807 LYs). …”
-
18
-
19
Deterministic result of the base-case analysis.
Published 2024“…Efficacy data and baseline characteristics in the base-case analysis were primarily derived from the 11-year results of the HERA trial. …”
-
20