Search alternatives:
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
Number of CTD inferred g2p edges discovered with cluster predicted to be significant vs non-significant based on the four thresholds.
Published 2024“…<p>Number of CTD inferred g2p edges discovered with cluster predicted to be significant vs non-significant based on the four thresholds.…”
-
145
-
146
-
147
Grade-based variations.
Published 2025“…The results revealed a moderate level of overall engagement (M = 4.02 on a 5-point scale), with emotional engagement scoring the highest (M = 4.10), followed by behavioral (M = 3.99) and cognitive engagement (M = 3.98). A gender-based analysis revealed significant differences in cognitive performance (p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.27) and overall engagement (p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.17), with males scoring higher. …”
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
Flow diagram representing bromeliad death by overcrowding within the Bromeliad-death procedure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette.
Published 2025Subjects: -
157
-
158
-
159
-
160