Search alternatives:
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
based based » based case (Expand Search), based basis (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
A: Additional statistical information for significant comparisons for positive affect increase in moderate trait anxiety participants.
Published 2022“…<p>B: Additional statistical information for significant comparisons for negative affect decrease in moderate trait anxiety participants.…”
-
4
-
5
The link between barriers and how they affect the consequences based on the SHIPP theory.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
List of IPA-predicted significantly activated or inhibited Sertoli cell "Diseases and Functions" affected by ZIKV infection.
Published 2020“…<p>Only those with predicted significantly affected activation or inhibition are indicated, in red or green, respectively. …”
-
7
Genes significantly affected by deletion of <i>ryfA</i>.
Published 2021“…(<b>B</b>) Genes classified in different categories based on log2 fold-change difference. Genes upregulated (yellow rectangles) and downregulated (blue rectangles) by at least 1.7-fold were considered significant with P < 0.05. …”
-
8
-
9
Heterogeneity analysis of the bargaining effect based on characteristics of IBs.
Published 2023Subjects: -
10
Heterogeneity analysis of the bargaining effect based on characteristics of executives.
Published 2023Subjects: -
11
Optogenetic stimulation of the hippocampal CA1 astrocytes does not significantly affect the expression of AMPA receptors or VGLUT2.
Published 2024“…Results are expressed as mean ± SD (<i>n</i> = 4). n.s., not significant (one-way ANOVA). Source data can be found in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002687#pbio.3002687.s025" target="_blank">S1 Data</a>.…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
Estimated marginal means of the RMS per muscle, based on the linear mixed-effects model.
Published 2022Subjects: -
15
Estimated marginal means of the MF per muscle, based on the linear mixed-effects model.
Published 2022Subjects: -
16
-
17
Differences in CAR based on individual characteristics after the marine healing program.
Published 2023Subjects: -
18
Differences in CAR based on individual characteristics before the marine healing program.
Published 2023Subjects: -
19
-
20
Relative abundance of the phyla of dominant bacteria based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
Published 2024Subjects: