Search alternatives:
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
based biased » based case (Expand Search), sex biased (Expand Search), male biased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
based biased » based case (Expand Search), sex biased (Expand Search), male biased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
The results of the Egger test (checking the existence of publication bias).
Published 2024Subjects: -
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
Temporal profiles of the key BO-NN features.
Published 2020“…Spearman correlations between the predicted and observed activity of the key BO-NN features were calculated and averaged over the six cross-validation folds. …”
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
Risk of bias assessment result.
Published 2025“…No predictor reached statistical significance for HHS or THA conversion. However, mean age showed a borderline significant association with VAS (coefficient = −0.8029; P = 0.065), suggesting a possible trend of more significant pain reduction in older patients.…”
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140