Search alternatives:
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based biased » based case (Expand Search), sex biased (Expand Search), male biased (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based biased » based case (Expand Search), sex biased (Expand Search), male biased (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
Risk of bias (
Published 2025“…The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. …”
-
94
-
95
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2024“…Upon analysis, the papers included in this study did not have significant publication bias (Begg’s Test P = 0.210) and had good consistency (P>0.05). …”
-
96
Risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…No predictor reached statistical significance for HHS or THA conversion. However, mean age showed a borderline significant association with VAS (coefficient = −0.8029; P = 0.065), suggesting a possible trend of more significant pain reduction in older patients.…”
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
Supplementary Material for: Excess Significance Bias in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Literature for Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Published 2019“…Evidence for an excess of significant findings was also observed for SMD = 0.5 for neurological disorders. …”