Point cell model behavior. by Evan Cudone (5768813)

Funnel plots of publication bias. by Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis (12916598)

Subjects:

Risk of bias assessment result. by Robin Novriansyah (18127530)

“…No predictor reached statistical significance for HHS or THA conversion. However, mean age showed a borderline significant association with VAS (coefficient = −0.8029; P = 0.065), suggesting a possible trend of more significant pain reduction in older patients.…”

Summary of significant LMM coefficients and contrasts on log-transformed RTs. by Arianna Compostella (8843135)

Funnel plot of the included studies. Egger’s test did not indicate significant publication bias (z  = −1.0148, p = 0.3102). by Megan Doyle (14583058)

Determination of the ventilatory threshold (VT) point. by Kazufumi Hisamoto (21416905)

Phenotype and molecular identification of <i>GmNN1/FT2a</i> in stable transgenic soybean plants. by Xinxin Li (281237)

Dose-dependent effect of dental materials on hatching rate of zebrafish embryos and larvae at the indicated time points. by Meltem Karahan (19713246)

Join-point regression analysis of the severity of road traffic accidents in Shandong Province from 2001 to 2019. by Tao Wang (12008)

PA psychological correlates direction of effect results sorted by risk of bias and type of apps. by Zihao He (8780582)

QUADAS-2 risk of bias and applicability of selected studies. by V. Abeysuriya (11985239)

Risk of bias. by Joel D’Souza (6900548)

“…In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due to significant heterogeneity in this field of research. …”

Results of the RCTs risk of bias judgments about each risk of bias item for each included trail. by Zhengfa Han (14434281)

Results of the RCTs risk of bias: Judgments about each risk of bias item for each included trail. by Zhengfa Han (14434281)

Judgement of risk of bias which was assessed according to the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool V2 for RCTs. by Xue Li (285380)

Risk of bias assessment. by Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi (18692700)

“…Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration’s impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). …”

Risk of bias graph and summary. by Junjie Zhou (3985985)

“…The inclusion criteria were established via the PICOS framework. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed via the GRADE approach. …”

RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in%, line) across time points, with 95% confidence interval. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

CASP risk of bias assessment. by Madina Syzdykova (21161836)

“…<div><p>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) presents a significant respiratory challenge in infants born prematurely. …”

Space impression evaluated using the SDM (7-point Likert scale). by Hiroyuki Fukumoto (18197728)