Showing 21 - 40 results of 51,227 for search '(( significant based case ) OR ( significant we decrease ))', query time: 1.94s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27

    Deterministic result of the base-case analysis. by Sudewi Mukaromah Khoirunnisa (15288505)

    Published 2024
    “…Efficacy data and baseline characteristics in the base-case analysis were primarily derived from the 11-year results of the HERA trial. …”
  8. 28
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32

    Significantly Enriched Pathways. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

    Published 2025
    “…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
  13. 33

    Base-case results. by Mingxi Xie (19812594)

    Published 2024
    “…Clinical findings have showed that deprescribing service significantly decreased inappropriate PPIs utilization. …”
  14. 34
  15. 35

    The base case analysis. by Wenwang Lang (20293527)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the base-case scenario, adding benmelstobart and anlotinib to chemotherapy increased QALYs by 0.34 at an additional cost of $24,684.07, yielding an ICER of $71,559.84 per QALY. …”
  16. 36
  17. 37

    Base-case results. by Shuo Kang (1306860)

    Published 2025
    “…One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model results,</p><p>Results</p><p>In base-case analysis, compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, ITH-testing directed therapy could bring additional 0.14 QALYs and 0.29 QALYs, with marginal costs of $3750.75 and $7778.18, resulting in the ICER of $27,353.27/QALY and $26,461.46/QALY, respectively, which lower than the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. …”
  18. 38
  19. 39

    Base-case analysis. by Akiko Kowada (14659965)

    Published 2023
    “…The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at US$50,000 per QALY gained. In the base-case analysis, HTLV-1 antenatal screening (US$76.85, 24.94766 QALYs, 24.94813 LYs, ICER; US$40,100 per QALY gained) was cost-effective compared with no screening (US$2.18, 24.94580 QALYs, 24.94807 LYs). …”
  20. 40