Search alternatives:
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
based case » base case (Expand Search), based cancer (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
based case » base case (Expand Search), based cancer (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
Deterministic result of the base-case analysis.
Published 2024“…Efficacy data and baseline characteristics in the base-case analysis were primarily derived from the 11-year results of the HERA trial. …”
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
33
Base-case results.
Published 2024“…Clinical findings have showed that deprescribing service significantly decreased inappropriate PPIs utilization. …”
-
34
-
35
The base case analysis.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the base-case scenario, adding benmelstobart and anlotinib to chemotherapy increased QALYs by 0.34 at an additional cost of $24,684.07, yielding an ICER of $71,559.84 per QALY. …”
-
36
-
37
Base-case results.
Published 2025“…One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model results,</p><p>Results</p><p>In base-case analysis, compared with toripalimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, ITH-testing directed therapy could bring additional 0.14 QALYs and 0.29 QALYs, with marginal costs of $3750.75 and $7778.18, resulting in the ICER of $27,353.27/QALY and $26,461.46/QALY, respectively, which lower than the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. …”
-
38
-
39
Base-case analysis.
Published 2023“…The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at US$50,000 per QALY gained. In the base-case analysis, HTLV-1 antenatal screening (US$76.85, 24.94766 QALYs, 24.94813 LYs, ICER; US$40,100 per QALY gained) was cost-effective compared with no screening (US$2.18, 24.94580 QALYs, 24.94807 LYs). …”
-
40