Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
-
1
Statistically significant linear increase in use of antidepressants during the observed time period.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
14
-
15
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
16
-
17
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”