Search alternatives:
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
9
-
10
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…The red line represents the significance threshold (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>). …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Significance analysis data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”