بدائل البحث:
significant benefits » significant effects (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
يعرض 1 - 5 نتائج من 5 نتيجة بحث عن '(( significant benefits decrease ) OR ( significantly ((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))~', وقت الاستعلام: 0.46s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Data Sheet 1_Hemodynamic changes and their relationship with white matter hyperintensities in CSVD patients with cognitive impairment: a 4D flow study.pdf حسب Jiajun Cao (11560062)

    منشور في 2025
    "…There was a moderately positive correlation between MMSE, MoCA score and flow rate, flow velocity, and WSS (r = 0.226–0.544, all P < 0.05), and a moderately negative correlation between MMSE, MoCA score and PI, RI (r = −0.230 to −0.406, all P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression indicated that, the flow rate and mean velocity in venous sinuses (β = −0.472 to −0.381, all P < 0.05) and the WSS in arterial segments (β = −0.771 to −0.441, all P < 0.05) had independently negative association with WMH burden; Meanwhile, a significant positive relationship was found between PI in arterial segments and specific-distributed WMH (PVWMH and S-CC WMH) (β = 0.239 to 0.356, all P < 0.05).…"
  4. 4

    Data Sheet 1_Listening to mom in the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized trial of increased maternal speech exposure on white matter connectivity in infants born preterm.pdf حسب Katherine E. Travis (6680396)

    منشور في 2025
    "…</p>Results<p>Groups were equivalent on medical and demographic variables. Linear mixed models demonstrated that compared to the C-group, the T-group demonstrated significantly lower MD in the left (scan 1: β = −0.11, Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27; scan 2: β = −0.12, Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33) but not right arcuate (scan 1: β = −0.06, Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.09; scan 2: β = −0.03, Marginal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.01). …"
  5. 5

    Optimisation of read depth, DNA quantity, and unique alternate observation threshold. حسب Melinda L. Tursky (20790436)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Variants with a prevalence of ≥ 10% within this cohort were excluded as likely sequencing artefacts, which excluded 10.5% of variants (D). The mean number of variants detected per sample above the standard CHIP threshold of ≥ 0.02 VAF increased linearly with subject age (E). …"