Risk of bias assessment in the non-RCTs of Wang, 2013 –ROBINS-I tool. by Luz Estella Mesa (8339283)

The funnel plot based on COVID-19 infection in non-health care workers (A) and health care workers (B). by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

Subjects:

NN analysis to assign the importance of variables. by Sulmaz Ghahramani (3387635)

Publication bias for studies assessing the association between maternal infection and ID in children, indication a significant publication bias. by Mahroo Rezaeinejad (17101769)

The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters. by Ashraf Attia Mahmoud (21262201)

Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

“…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”

Complete results of significance tests. by Tianqi Yang (9043082)

Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO₂ laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”

Significantly Enriched Pathways. by Jiyong Zhang (2498740)

Subjects:

Risk of bias graph: Based on researchers’ opinions about each risk of bias item, percentages are presented for all included studies. by Hanle Wang (9287142)

Estimate of the coefficient for covariates of each topic, * indicates interaction terms. Only statistically significant (up to significance level of 0.1) are shown. by Elma Akand (22209030)

Treatment with pan-PKC inhibitor Gö-6983 resulted in a non-significant decrease in <i>GRK6</i> promoter activity. by Maike Stegen (8578665)

Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and... by Robert Trybulski (10998702)

SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers. by Deborah K. Johnson (10001156)

Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals. by Natalie M. Bath (6316517)

“…(A) T (CD3⁺) and (B) B (CD45R⁺) cell flow crossmatch was performed in non-sensitized animals. IgG1⁺ in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS^-/- significantly decreased compared to APRIL^-/- (p<0.03). …”

Posterior distribution for the standardized effect size of difference between significant and non-significant results for reviewers, given the used priors. by Jasmine Muradchanian (11177488)

Subjects:

Posterior distribution for the standardized effect size of difference between significant and non-significant results for authors, given the used priors. by Jasmine Muradchanian (11177488)

Subjects:

Posterior distribution for the standardized effect size of difference between significant and non-significant results for editors, given the used priors. by Jasmine Muradchanian (11177488)

Subjects:

Checking the existence of publication bias based on funnel plot. by Bahman Ahadinezhad (12229406)

Subjects:

Evaluation of bias risk based on cochrane collaboration guidelines. by Huishan Song (20536686)