Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
bias based » biomass based (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
bias based » biomass based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Overexpression of Gαq decreases cell number and cell size.
Published 2021“…Overexpression of Gαq in the pouch results in a decrease in total wing area, cell number and cell size. 10 samples were analyzed per condition. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
19
-
20