Heat map of <i>H</i>. <i>megidis</i> statistically significant proteins. by Peter E. Lillis (12368582)

Behavior of subjects during bias-against and bias-for trials. by Lorenzo Ferrucci (11520271)

Adjusted publication bias using the trim and fill method. by Qiong Wei (109177)

Assessment of publication bias using the funnel plot. by Martin Ackah (11888622)

Subjects:

Results common method bias text. by Kejun Wu (4800972)

Risk of bias graph. by Mingkun Yu (465162)

“…The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to measure the risk of bias and conducted GRADE evaluation to determine the certainty of evidence. …”

Graphical representation of BIAS, MSE; MRE values of Table 4. by Yousef F. Alharbi (20108006)

Graphical representation of BIAS, MSE; MRE values of Table 3. by Yousef F. Alharbi (20108006)

Graphical representation of BIAS, MSE; MRE values of Table 5. by Yousef F. Alharbi (20108006)

Graphical representation of BIAS, MSE; MRE values of Table 1. by Yousef F. Alharbi (20108006)

Graphical representation of BIAS, MSE; MRE values of Table 2. by Yousef F. Alharbi (20108006)

The results of the Egger test (checking the existence of publication bias). by Bahman Ahadinezhad (12229406)

Subjects:

Quality assessment and risk of bias. by Adesola Zadiat Musa (18404554)

Subjects:

Growth on stiff substrate results in mild lifespan extension but a decrease in organismal health. by Maria Oorloff (19658113)

RSCU codon bias. by Likuan Liu (16898755)

The table to chek the publication bias objectively. by Molla Yigzaw Birhanu (7490309)

Subjects:

Summary of risk of bias for each trial. by Shuliang Zhao (635164)

Subjects:

Risk of bias graph about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. by Shuliang Zhao (635164)

Subjects:

Funnel plots of publication bias. by Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis (12916598)

Subjects:

Risk of bias assessment result. by Robin Novriansyah (18127530)

“…No predictor reached statistical significance for HHS or THA conversion. However, mean age showed a borderline significant association with VAS (coefficient = −0.8029; P = 0.065), suggesting a possible trend of more significant pain reduction in older patients.…”