Showing 1 - 20 results of 36,644 for search '(( significant bias case ) OR ( significant ((we decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.32s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Egger’s plot for publication bias. by Shirin Yaghoobpoor (12994035)

    Published 2024
    “…The average EDSS among patients was 4.56. We found that blood levels of IGF-1 (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.59, I2 = 82.4%, K = 8, n = 692), CSF level of IGF-1 (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.56, I2 = 0.0%, K = 3 n = 164) and blood levels of GH were not significantly higher in MS patients than controls (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.33 to 0.49, I2 = 77.0% K = 3, n = 421). …”
  11. 11

    Risk of bias NOS for case-control studies. by Céline Daelemans (21763094)

    Published 2025
    “…The NOS, RoB2, and ROBINS-I tools were used to assess risk of bias. Results relevant to our outcomes of interest were extracted and summarized in tables.…”
  12. 12

    Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses by Jing Wang (6206297)

    Published 2025
    “…By compiling a global data set of 1,782 paired observations from 185 publications, we show that land use conversion from natural to managed ecosystems significantly reduced NNM by 7.5% (−11.5, −2.8%) and increased NN by 150% (86, 194%), indicating decreasing N availability while increasing potential N loss through denitrification and nitrate leaching. …”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Publication bias of the risk of all groups. by Juan Gu (288925)

    Published 2025
    “…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
  17. 17

    Overview of the WeARTolerance program. by Ana Beato (20489933)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20