Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
2
-
3
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20