Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
visits decreased » cost decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
visits decreased » cost decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Bias risk assessments for each RCT study.
Published 2025“…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …”
-
15
Bias risk assessments for each RCS study.
Published 2025“…The combined findings showed that high-dose TXA was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -215.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-367.58, -63.37), P < 0.001], as well as a decreased likelihood of transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.53), P < 0.001]. …”
-
16
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20