Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 2,085 for search '(( significant bias decrease ) OR ( significant ((greater decrease) OR (greatest decrease)) ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Group differences in perceptual bias scores.

    Group differences in perceptual bias scores. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Summary of risk of bias.

    Summary of risk of bias. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Correlations between perceptual bias scores, age, and autism-associated features: Simple linear regression showing a significant correlation between elevated proprioceptive bias and:

    Correlations between perceptual bias scores, age, and autism-associated features: Simple linear regression showing a significant correlation between elevated proprioceptive bias an... by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool.

    Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect.

    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect. by Getachew Magnar Kitila (19935139)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Most significant muscle activation values.

    Most significant muscle activation values. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.

    Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.

    Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Graph of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (A); Summary of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (B).

    Graph of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (A); Summary of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (B). by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Risk of bias summary.

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Calculation of perceptual bias scores.

    Calculation of perceptual bias scores. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Bias risk assessments for each RCT study.

    Bias risk assessments for each RCT study. by Xin Liu (43569)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Bias risk assessments for each RCS study.

    Bias risk assessments for each RCS study. by Xin Liu (43569)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Study selection criteria.

    Study selection criteria. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    PICOS criteria for the SLR.

    PICOS criteria for the SLR. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    PRISMA flow chart.

    PRISMA flow chart. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Forest plot for the significant MR association between four mediators and anti-H. pylori IgG seropositivity.

    Forest plot for the significant MR association between four mediators and anti-H. pylori IgG seropositivity. by Jing Wang (6206297)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: