Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,172 for search '(( significant bias decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (scores decreased)) ))', query time: 0.82s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Correlations between perceptual bias scores, age, and autism-associated features: Simple linear regression showing a significant correlation between elevated proprioceptive bias and:

    Correlations between perceptual bias scores, age, and autism-associated features: Simple linear regression showing a significant correlation between elevated proprioceptive bias an... by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Calculation of perceptual bias scores.

    Calculation of perceptual bias scores. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Group differences in perceptual bias scores.

    Group differences in perceptual bias scores. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Logistics regression analysis for the associations between decreased kidney function (eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and sex-specific z-scores of anthropometric indices, weighted.

    Logistics regression analysis for the associations between decreased kidney function (eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and sex-specific z-scores of anthropometric indices, weig... by Xinyun Chen (6655703)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Brain regions with significantly decreased activations for the Raven task are shown in blue.

    Brain regions with significantly decreased activations for the Raven task are shown in blue. by Morteza Fattahi (15892028)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Experimental paradigm and sample data.

    Experimental paradigm and sample data. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Error calculation.

    Error calculation. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Participant demographics for all participants included in analysis.

    Participant demographics for all participants included in analysis. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    HaptiKart videogame.

    HaptiKart videogame. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Visual and proprioceptive-error feedback.

    Visual and proprioceptive-error feedback. by Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Matching estimation results of propensity score.

    Matching estimation results of propensity score. by Yanling Li (269030)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.

    Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations. by Dai Nogimura (21445649)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    PEDro scores of included studies.

    PEDro scores of included studies. by Flor Isela Torres-Rojo (22097369)

    Published 2025
    “…The effect of vigorous interventions showed an increase in antioxidants (Z=2.44, I<sup>2</sup>=67%, p=0.01) and a decrease in oxidants (Z=5.44, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, p<0.00001), while in non-vigorous exercise, no significant differences were observed in redox status.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Summary of risk of bias.

    Summary of risk of bias. by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    NIH score.

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.

    Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA. by Mieke L. M. Bentvelzen (21594442)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study.

    Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study. by Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.

    Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group. by Silas Manning (22693338)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool.

    Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. by Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: