Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”