Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
significant mean » significant main (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias increased » bias increases (Expand Search), via increased (Expand Search), bems increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
significant mean » significant main (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias increased » bias increases (Expand Search), via increased (Expand Search), bems increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Egger’s test of publication bias for the pooled MD estimate of MPV between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
3
Egger’stest of publication bias for the pooled WMD estimate of PC between PE and NT groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
4
-
5
Summary of NOS bias assessments.
Published 2024“…Following thresholds were significantly increased: mechanical detection thresholds for punctate stimuli (mean difference (95% CI) 3.3 (1.6, 6.9) mN (P = 0.002)), warmth detection thresholds (3.2 (1.6, 4.7) °C (P = 0.0001)), cool detection thresholds (-3.2 (-4.9, -1.6) °C (P = 0.0001)), and heat pain thresholds (1.9 (1.1, 2.7) °C (P = 0.00001)). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Study characteristics and published significant vs non-significant study findings (<i>n</i> = 522).
Published 2023Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
The Deek’s funnel-plot asymmetry test to assess publication bias of included studies.
Published 2023Subjects: -
19
A graph showing risk of bias and applicability concerns among included studies.
Published 2023Subjects: -
20