Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias increases » first increases (Expand Search), firms increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
bias increases » first increases (Expand Search), firms increases (Expand Search), i increases (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Study characteristics and published significant vs non-significant study findings (<i>n</i> = 522).
Published 2023Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Egger’s plot for publication bias.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Finally, we included 11 eligible studies from 1998 to 2018. The sample size of included studies varied from 20 to 200 resulting in a total sample size of 1067 individuals, 531 MS patients, and 536 healthy controls. …”