Risk of bias assessment. by Gareth J. Hollands (9038062)

The small blue circles show the IC-volume (mean of left and right) from 72 males and the small red squares from 51 females as a function of age. by Pingling Kwok (14896191)

Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs). by Jeffrey S. Stein (11689918)

Funnel plots evaluating the effect of publication bias. by Gergő Berke (12575146)

Critical level of hidden bias (Γ). by Pallavi Rajkhowa (11619488)

Subjects:

Rac1 depletion decreases DMV escape. by Erin A. Weddle (12133567)

Taxa with relative abundances significantly changed by the filtration bias as introduce by the different filtration volumes (first experiment) and as identified using EdgeR. by Corentin Fournier (5088941)

Subjects:

QUADAS-2 bias assessment results. by Arianna Bunnell (18213784)

Bias Domains Heatmap for Included Studies. by Mingxian Meng (21029668)

Subjects:

Anxiety associations with metacognitive and predictive bias. by Sarah M. Tashjian (5615795)

Risk of bias. by Shuyue Pang (11061243)

“…The retrieval deadline was July 15, 2023. Risk of bias 2.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. …”

Risk of bias graph. by Ziyi Li (349831)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Nine RCTs with a total of 855 patients were included in this study, and all included RCTs had a low overall quality risk of bias and high quality of reported information. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the use of CT, CER (%) was significantly improved due to Danshen decoction combined with CT (MD = 3.95, 95% CI [2.58, 6.04], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEF (%) was significantly improved (MD = 5.46, 95% CI [5.32, 5.60], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEDD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -5.27, 95% CI [-6.21, -4.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVESD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -4.60, 95% CI [-5.87, -3.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), BNP (pg/mL) was significantly reduced (MD = -88.61, 95% CI [-121.98, -55.24], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), NT-proBNP (pg/mL) was significantly decreased (SMD = -3.33, 95% CI [-5.92, -0.73], <i>P</i> = 0.01), hs-CRP (mg/L) was significantly decreased (MD = -2.73, 95% CI [-4.11, -1.34], <i>P</i> = 0.0001). …”

Risk of bias summary. by Ziyi Li (349831)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Nine RCTs with a total of 855 patients were included in this study, and all included RCTs had a low overall quality risk of bias and high quality of reported information. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the use of CT, CER (%) was significantly improved due to Danshen decoction combined with CT (MD = 3.95, 95% CI [2.58, 6.04], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEF (%) was significantly improved (MD = 5.46, 95% CI [5.32, 5.60], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEDD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -5.27, 95% CI [-6.21, -4.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVESD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -4.60, 95% CI [-5.87, -3.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), BNP (pg/mL) was significantly reduced (MD = -88.61, 95% CI [-121.98, -55.24], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), NT-proBNP (pg/mL) was significantly decreased (SMD = -3.33, 95% CI [-5.92, -0.73], <i>P</i> = 0.01), hs-CRP (mg/L) was significantly decreased (MD = -2.73, 95% CI [-4.11, -1.34], <i>P</i> = 0.0001). …”

Risk of bias assessments for each study on paediatric major trauma and associations with admission ionised hypocalcaemia. by Owen Hibberd (17896458)

Fig 3 - by Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan (9027487)

Subjects:

Fig 2 - by Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan (9027487)

Subjects:

PRISMA-based flowchart for the selection of studies risk of bias and GRADE quality of outcomes. by Hong Tang (191022)

Subjects:

Numbers of significant pairs among 48 risk factor-disease pairs at the significance cutoff of p-value < 0.001. by Zhaotong Lin (11726321)

Bacterial Lineage Cladograms with Significantly Different Representation in Infected and Uninfected Groups. by Xi-Meng Sun (17721428)

Risk of bias assessment [22]. by Omomene Iwelomen (18927895)

“…Knowledge substantially increased following the intervention, while attitude, self-care practices, and medication adherence showed no significant improvements. …”