Search alternatives:
significant binding » significant burden (Expand Search), significant mediating (Expand Search), significant benefits (Expand Search)
binding based » findings based (Expand Search), buildings based (Expand Search), binding poses (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant binding » significant burden (Expand Search), significant mediating (Expand Search), significant benefits (Expand Search)
binding based » findings based (Expand Search), buildings based (Expand Search), binding poses (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Plant growth, nodulation, and N content as affected by manipulating of GmNN1/FT2a.
Published 2022Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
Transcripts with increased translation efficiency during GSC to DGC transition have a significant loss in m6A methylation.
Published 2021“…Change in TE rank obtained by measuring degree of change in TE of individual transcripts between their respective GSC and DGC state and then ranking the transcripts accordingly (ranges from highest rank: greatest increase in TE with transition; to lowest rank: most decrease in TE). C) Percent composition of top 30% transcripts with most significant change in TE based on m6A status in individual samples (gain/unchanged/loss). …”
-
15
-
16
The differences of statistical significance for each binding category.
Published 2023“…<p>The statistical graph of the binding category of peptide classification is based on the MMPBSA energy. …”
-
17
Phenotype and molecular identification of <i>GmNN1/FT2a</i> in stable transgenic soybean plants.
Published 2022Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20