Pre-test score T-test results. by Seda Aktı Aslan (22582232)

Subjects:

Significant interactions and main effects of day. by Grace Hecker (18813445)

“…We found no significant interaction differences when we conducted post hoc tests for interaction comparisons. …”

Key significant pathways in the final models of self-compassion. by Eriko Takahashi (22608061)

Subjects:

Body weight. by Veronica Redaelli (7586621)

Subjects:

Gene set enrichment across all tissues and traits for those sets with at least one significant test (FDR<5%). by Luke M. Evans (2910047)

Molecular interactions of identified compounds studied using docking analysis; (A)- HMG-CoA interaction with eicosonoic acid; (B)- HMG-CoA interaction with linoleic acid; (C)- HMG-... by Jaykaran Charan (2573518)

Subjects:

Physiological parameters related to body mass, BMI and body fat percentage in boxers. by Yavuz Yasul (18605628)

Subjects:

Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

Subjects:

Heatmap of statistically significant interacting genes across disease states and smoking statuses. by Lavida R. K. Rogers (7829198)

Minimal dataset for tumor volume and body weight. by Yoshiaki Tadokoro (16851585)

Body and adrenal weights. by Jesús David Ayala-Rodríguez (17364296)

Interaction mechanism test. by He Leihua (19787065)

Phase 2 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

Phase 1 significant effects. by Wendy C. Crone (2262169)

Cabozantinib significantly decreases tumor volume and prolongs survival in SCNPC PDX models. by Mark P. Labrecque (10011469)

Box plot diagrams of the significant interaction between impressions techniques and abutment teeth mobility in Kennedy class III models. by Samar S. Alaghbari (21863491)

Box plot diagrams of the significant interaction between impressions techniques and abutment teeth mobility in Kennedy class I models. by Samar S. Alaghbari (21863491)

T-test results of the groups’ learning achievement post-test scores. by Seda Aktı Aslan (22582232)

Subjects:

The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim. by Noam Gordon (661276)

“…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …”

Influence of interactions of factors on slump error. by Zhou Tienan (16015372)

Subjects: