Showing 141 - 160 results of 34,859 for search '(( significant canker based ) OR ( significant ((teer decrease) OR (we decrease)) ))', query time: 1.00s Refine Results
  1. 141

    Summary statistics of the sample. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  2. 142

    Product attributes and attribute levels. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  3. 143

    Dataset used in this study. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  4. 144

    Definitions of the variables. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  5. 145

    A sample choice question without a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  6. 146

    A sample choice question with a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  7. 147
  8. 148

    Propensity-score matched open aortic group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    “…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
  9. 149

    Pre-match open aortic group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    “…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
  10. 150

    Pre-match CABG/Valve group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    “…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
  11. 151

    Propensity-score matched CABG/Valve group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    “…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
  12. 152

    Evaluation of citrus canker resistance in transgenic citrus independently overexpressing <i>CsGH3</i>.<i>1</i> (1-#) and <i>CsGH3</i>.<i>1L</i> (L-#). by Xiuping Zou (7436282)

    Published 2019
    “…Different letters on top of bars represent significant differences from wild-type (WT) controls based on Tukey’s test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).…”
  13. 153

    Baseline patient characteristics. by Oscar F. C. van den Bosch (22184246)

    Published 2025
    “…While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”
  14. 154

    Mean platelet volume and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio decrease in patients with depression with antidepressant treatment by AHMET ÖZTÜRK (8077292)

    Published 2022
    “…Discussion MPV of depressed patients was higher than controls. When we look at admission and discharge scores of clinical scales, decrement is statistically significant for both HAM-D and CGI-S. …”
  15. 155
  16. 156
  17. 157
  18. 158
  19. 159
  20. 160