Search alternatives:
significant canker » significant changes (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
canker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), canker disease (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant canker » significant changes (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
canker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), canker disease (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
201
Soil disturbance cross-sectional model.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
202
Test plan table.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
203
Gas jet subsoiling model.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
204
Schematic diagram of the airflow passage.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
205
Variation in soil penetration resistance.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
206
Supersonic gas jet subsoiler experiment.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional airfoil-shaped subsoiler, the supersonic gas jet subsoiler achieves optimal performance at a tillage speed of 0.5 m/s and a tillage depth of 380 mm. …”
-
207
Generated spline library.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
208
Correlation coefficient matrix.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
209
RMSE versus learning rate.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
210
RMSE versus training parameters.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
211
Assembly process of machine recognition form.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
212
Process of steel truss incremental launching.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
213
CGAN and AutoML stacking device.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
214
U-wave estimates versus R-matrix noise variance.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
215
Sliding window process.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
216
Assembly error angle of a single spline.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
217
Original record form of error matrix.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
218
Form for machine recognition.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
219
RMSE versus architectural parameters.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
220
Kalman process.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”