Search alternatives:
significant canker » significant changes (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
changed decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
canker disease » cancer disease (Expand Search), causes disease (Expand Search)
significant canker » significant changes (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
changed decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
canker disease » cancer disease (Expand Search), causes disease (Expand Search)
-
21
Plot of normal probability for the citrus canker disease predictive model based on two years data.
Published 2022Subjects: -
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
Reducing the Phytotoxicity of Tryptanthrin Derivatives for Controlling Plant Bacterial Canker and Wilt Diseases
Published 2025“…Additionally, compound <b>T7NHCO</b> can inhibit biofilm formation, damage bacterial morphology, downregulate the expression of bacterial chemotaxis-related proteins, cause bacterial necrosis, and effectively control citrus and kiwifruit canker (the curative and protective efficiency is 79.35 and 88.31%, respectively) diseases. …”
-
32
Geographic differences for how the per capita sales of spirits changed during the pandemic.
Published 2021Subjects: -
33
Post-RARP urinary continence recovery stratified by voided volume change.
Published 2022“…<p>Kaplan-Meier curves for post-operative continence recovery to (A) use of 1 pad or less per day, and (B) pad-free status, as stratified by change in voided volume. A statistically significant difference was found for both curves, with a larger decrease in voided volume exhibiting a lower continence rate (log-rank test: P value = 0.011 and 0.008, respectively). …”
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40