Search alternatives:
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
cause case » use case (Expand Search), base case (Expand Search)
Showing 141 - 160 results of 36,793 for search '(( significant cause case ) OR ( significant ((changes decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.80s Refine Results
  1. 141
    Descriptive statistics for work engagement by group and time.

    Descriptive statistics for work engagement by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 142
    Results of sequentially rejective Bonferroni procedure for CS, BO, and STS.

    Results of sequentially rejective Bonferroni procedure for CS, BO, and STS. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 143
    Plot of mean compassion satisfaction by group and time.

    Plot of mean compassion satisfaction by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 144
    Participants baseline demographic characteristics by groups (N = 81).

    Participants baseline demographic characteristics by groups (N = 81). by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 145
    Participant flowchart based on the CONSORT guidelines.

    Participant flowchart based on the CONSORT guidelines. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 146
    Plot of mean vigor by group and time.

    Plot of mean vigor by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 147
    Results of sequentially rejective Bonferroni procedure for work Engagement.

    Results of sequentially rejective Bonferroni procedure for work Engagement. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 148
    Plot of mean secondary trauma stress by group and time.

    Plot of mean secondary trauma stress by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 149
    Plot of mean Burnout by group and time.

    Plot of mean Burnout by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 150
    Cell proliferation was significantly decreased in full-length HPV16 E1 (pEGFP-E1) transfected cells.

    Cell proliferation was significantly decreased in full-length HPV16 E1 (pEGFP-E1) transfected cells. by Fern Baedyananda (11888703)

    Published 2021
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 151
    Wilcoxon sign rank test for significance of the climate periods.

    Wilcoxon sign rank test for significance of the climate periods. by Francis Kibagendi Nyambariga (16425739)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 152
    Ranked OD net percent decrease.

    Ranked OD net percent decrease. by Jimy Pinto (4376539)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 153
    Presentation_2_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_2_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 154
    Presentation_3_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_3_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 155
    Presentation_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 156
    Image_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.JPEG

    Image_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.JPEG by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 157
    Presentation_4_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_4_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 158
    Presentation_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 159
    Presentation_3_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF

    Presentation_3_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.PDF by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 160
    Image_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.JPEG

    Image_1_Changes in EEG Brain Connectivity Caused by Short-Term BCI Neurofeedback-Rehabilitation Training: A Case Study.JPEG by Youhao Wang (11018193)

    Published 2021
    “…In the ERP-based brain network analysis, the neurofeedback group’s network parameters were attenuated in all scales significantly (t-test value: p < 0.01); while the non-feedback group’s most network parameters didn’t change significantly (t-test value: p > 0.05).…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: