Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
cause decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), causes increased (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
cause decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), causes increased (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Genome-wide gene-vegetarianism interactions reaching suggestive significance.
Published 2024“…<p>Full cohort and sex-stratified results for all interactions reaching the suggestive significance threshold of <i>P</i><1e-05. …”
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
Interaction plot for arrowhead agility (L).
Published 2024“…The results of a two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group × time interaction for the arrowhead agility test (left) after 8 weeks training (<i>p</i> < .01). …”
-
136
-
137
Interaction plot for arrowhead agility (R).
Published 2024“…The results of a two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated a significant group × time interaction for the arrowhead agility test (right) during the 8-week training period (<i>p</i> < .01), while no main effects were found. …”
-
138
-
139
Interaction plot for arrowhead dribble (L).
Published 2024“…The results of a two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group × time interaction for the arrowhead dribble test (left; <i>p</i> < .01), while the main effects for group were found, indicating a different mean change between the SAQ and GTG groups.…”
-
140