Search alternatives:
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
change based » image based (Expand Search), change rate (Expand Search), case based (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
change based » image based (Expand Search), change rate (Expand Search), case based (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
<i>Trappc9</i> deficient mice show a decrease in brain weight and size.
Published 2020“…<p><b>(A)</b><i>Trappc9</i> deficient mice show a decrease in brain weight in a parent-of-origin manner. …”
-
9
-
10
QUIPS risk of bias assessment.
Published 2023“…Exercise load and anaerobic threshold did not correlate with morbidity or mortality. There was significant heterogeneity between studies.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Estimates of cardiopulmonary fitness as evidenced by higher peak, measured and as a percentage of predicted, were associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Top 10 significantly changed metabolites and lipids in each clinical outcome measure group.
Published 2023“…The orange color indicates increase in levels and the blue color represent decrease in levels. (A) MMS status, yes vs. no (B) change in (Δ) QMG (> 40% vs. < 0%) (C) change in (Δ) MG-ADL (> 40% vs. < 0%), (D) Responder versus Non-Responder. …”
-
19
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
20