Search alternatives:
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
change decrease » change increases (Expand Search), change degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
-
263
-
264
-
265
-
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
-
271
Morphological changes in the testis and epididymis.
Published 2025“…B & F) There were no significant changes in the Vit versus control rats. …”
-
272
-
273
Correlation between treatment-induced changes in lumbar motor control and N150 amplitude.
Published 2024Subjects: -
274
-
275
Comparison between juvenile and adult demyelination.
Published 2025“…Juvenile demyelination leads to impairment in PV interneuron maturation whereas adult demyelination induces a decrease in the excitability of PV interneurons. Summary data showing the averaged (± s.e.m) of the following intrinsic properties: (A) Resting membrane potential (RMP) (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, ****p < 0.0001, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001</i>), (B) Input resistance (IR) (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0024, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001</i>), (C) Sag (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0083, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01</i>), (D) Rheobase (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, p = 0.1230, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05</i>) and (E) Action potential (AP) threshold (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, *p = 0.0452, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05</i>), (F) AP half-width (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0058, post-hoc LSD test: **p < 0.01</i>), (G) Average action potential (AP) frequency in response to 0–650 pA current steps illustrating no significant change in S1 PV interneuron firing frequency following juvenile demyelination (<i>group x current two-way repeated measures: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group: F(39,1,291) = 2.487, ****p < 0.0001</i>) and (H) Maximum firing frequency per group (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, ****p < 0.0001, post-hoc LSD test: ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001</i>). …”
-
276
-
277
-
278
-
279
-
280