Search alternatives:
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
change faced » change based (Expand Search), challenges faced (Expand Search), change rate (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
change faced » change based (Expand Search), challenges faced (Expand Search), change rate (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
MEG main effect of material: Word-faces.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) Main effect of material: word versus face condition irrespective of memory: significant clusters (<i>p</i><sub>corr</sub> < 0.05) returned by a cluster permutation statistic clustering across sensors, frequencies (“Freq”), and channels. …”
-
2
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Leptin receptor deficiency caused decrease in cortical bone mainly in female mice.
Published 2020“…Post Hoc testing indicated that increased Ct.BS/BV was only significant in male mice on WD p < 0.05. Ct.Ar/Tt.A<i>r</i> = cortical area fraction; Ct.Ar = cortical area; Ct.Th = cortical thickness; Tt.Ar = total area; Ct. …”
-
9
-
10
Face-to-face distance ([mm]).
Published 2023“…The results showed that eye contact significantly increased and the face-to-face distance and angle decreased in the AR group, while the Doll group had no significant difference. …”
-
11
-
12
Face-to-face angle (yaw rotation [deg]).
Published 2023“…The results showed that eye contact significantly increased and the face-to-face distance and angle decreased in the AR group, while the Doll group had no significant difference. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
Face detection rate.
Published 2023“…The results showed that eye contact significantly increased and the face-to-face distance and angle decreased in the AR group, while the Doll group had no significant difference. …”
-
16
-
17
Main characteristics of included papers.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/Significance</p><p>Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease of <i>S</i>. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20