Search alternatives:
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search)
change increases » large increases (Expand Search), age increased (Expand Search), care increased (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
Showing 61 - 80 results of 59,105 for search '(( significant change increases ) OR ( significant ((force decrease) OR (fold decrease)) ))', query time: 1.46s Refine Results
  1. 61
    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 62
    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 63
    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 64
    Force capability according to the condition levels of the waist belt.

    Force capability according to the condition levels of the waist belt. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 65
    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 50–100 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 66
    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 0–50 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 67
    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 150–200 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 68
    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 69
    Force capability according to the condition levels of the thigh brace.

    Force capability according to the condition levels of the thigh brace. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 70
    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N.

    Average stiffness for the force range of 100–150 N. by Jihun Kim (10091)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 71
    Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features.

    Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

    Published 2025
    “…<b>(B)</b> Volcano plot highlighting the significantly different metabolomic features. The red dots represent the features with significantly increased intensity, and the purple dots represent the features with significantly decreased intensity. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 72
    List of DEGs in S. aureus PS/Bac/317/16/W strain spiked PCs vs TSB with log2fold-change ≥ 2 or ≤ -2, p<0.05.

    List of DEGs in S. aureus PS/Bac/317/16/W strain spiked PCs vs TSB with log2fold-change ≥ 2 or ≤ -2, p<0.05. by Basit Yousuf (630368)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 73
    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for peak net relative force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95% CI indicated by the ends of the vertical error bar.

    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for peak net relative force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95% CI indicated by... by Nicholas J. Ripley (14709756)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 74
    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for peak eccentric hamstring force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95% CI indicated by the ends of the vertical error bar.

    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for peak eccentric hamstring force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95% CI indica... by Nicholas J. Ripley (14709756)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 75
    Amount of LULC component change (sq km) of DNCC from 1992–2022.

    Amount of LULC component change (sq km) of DNCC from 1992–2022. by Mashura Shammi (9033173)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 76
    Variations of quantities of physical interest for the changes in Re and <i>Ha</i>.

    Variations of quantities of physical interest for the changes in Re and <i>Ha</i>. by Lei Zhang (38117)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 77
    Placental amino acid transporter and insulin receptor protein levels, fold changes and SD.

    Placental amino acid transporter and insulin receptor protein levels, fold changes and SD. by Vivi F. H. Jensen (12306563)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 78
    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for relative peak eccentric hamstring force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95% CI indicated by the ends of the vertical error bar.

    Gardner-Altman estimation plots identifying Pre- and Post-intervention individual changes for relative peak eccentric hamstring force and Hedge’s <i>g</i> effect size with the 95%... by Nicholas J. Ripley (14709756)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 79
    Two fetal folds visible on the right flank of Southern Resident calf L120 (September 6, 2014).

    Two fetal folds visible on the right flank of Southern Resident calf L120 (September 6, 2014). by Joseph K. Gaydos (8830838)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 80
    Species richness decreases significantly with increasing percent disturbance.

    Species richness decreases significantly with increasing percent disturbance. by Catherine L. Cardelús (6429320)

    Published 2019
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: