Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
changes based » change based (Expand Search), cases based (Expand Search), classes based (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
changes based » change based (Expand Search), cases based (Expand Search), classes based (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Summary of the earliest time point for significant WD-induced changes in NASH-associated markers.
Published 2023“…The figure illustrates the earliest time point for a significant change in the marker abundance and whether the marker <b>Increased</b> or <b>Decreased</b> in response to the WD. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Evaluation of changes in some cytokine levels in survivor and non-survivor groups.
Published 2021Subjects: -
8
-
9
Change in average relative abundance of significantly different ASVs within distinct phyla classifications at all three time points for the three different treatments.
Published 2020“…</b> For the control treatment, the change in average relative abundance of significantly different bacteria taxa in their relative phyla classifications generally decreased throughout consecutive time points. …”
-
10
Change in the levels of parental stressors or rewards between time point 1 and time point 2.
Published 2022Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Summary of post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with psychotherapies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
Summary of post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with FDA-approved medications.
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
Post-treatment CAPS score changes from clinical trials with off-label PTSD medications.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
Top 10 significantly changed metabolites and lipids in each clinical outcome measure group.
Published 2023“…The orange color indicates increase in levels and the blue color represent decrease in levels. (A) MMS status, yes vs. no (B) change in (Δ) QMG (> 40% vs. < 0%) (C) change in (Δ) MG-ADL (> 40% vs. < 0%), (D) Responder versus Non-Responder. …”
-
19
-
20
Summary of results based on the results of Mancova’s analysis, highlighting the relationship between the acoustic parameters of the three studied species and the noise gradient recorded in two wind farms and a low-noise area. “n.s.” denotes non-significant changes.
Published 2025“…“n.s.” denotes non-significant changes.</p>…”