Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
changes based » change based (Expand Search), cases based (Expand Search), classes based (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
changes based » change based (Expand Search), cases based (Expand Search), classes based (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
Summary of the earliest time point for significant WD-induced changes in NASH-associated markers.
Published 2023“…The figure illustrates the earliest time point for a significant change in the marker abundance and whether the marker <b>Increased</b> or <b>Decreased</b> in response to the WD. …”
-
27
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
28
Data_Sheet_1_Organic Contaminant Mixture Significantly Changes Microbenthic Community Structure and Increases the Expression of PAH Degradation Genes.DOCX
Published 2020“…Conversely, a significant decrease in relative abundance from 18.2 ± 5.6% in control to 7 ± 3.4% in of the genus Paraplectana was also detected. …”
-
29
Data_Sheet_1_Organic Contaminant Mixture Significantly Changes Microbenthic Community Structure and Increases the Expression of PAH Degradation Genes.DOCX
Published 2020“…Conversely, a significant decrease in relative abundance from 18.2 ± 5.6% in control to 7 ± 3.4% in of the genus Paraplectana was also detected. …”
-
30
-
31
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
32
-
33
-
34
Top 10 significantly changed metabolites and lipids in each clinical outcome measure group.
Published 2023“…The orange color indicates increase in levels and the blue color represent decrease in levels. …”
-
35
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
36
-
37
-
38
Heatmap of selected compounds which showed significant changes in concentration in potato tissues in response to ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) infection (padj < 0.01), based on HP (tomato potato psyllid infected with ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum’) vs CP (uninfected tomato potato psyllid) treatments.
Published 2025“…<p>Heatmap of selected compounds which showed significant changes in concentration in potato tissues in response to ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) infection (padj < 0.01), based on HP (tomato potato psyllid infected with ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter solanacearum’) vs CP (uninfected tomato potato psyllid) treatments.…”
-
39
-
40