Comparison of step rate, step length, stance time, and flight time between tasks in eight intervals from the start to the 40 m mark. by Shinnosuke Hase (20917896)

Relationship between the change in by Akihiro Kakimoto (343218)

Changes in ocular stress after wearing orthokeratology lenses. by Zhao-Yang Meng (18389630)

Subjects:

The animation of tension changes after wearing orthokeratology lenses. by Zhao-Yang Meng (18389630)

Subjects:

Significant associations in GWAS. by Dai Nogimura (21445649)

“…These significant associations could be explained by the change in downstream NO signaling, supporting the relationship between the investigated traits and vascular function. …”

Changes in subcutaneous fat thickness and muscle mass (Approximately here). by Burhan Demirkıran (21601740)

Changes related to kidney staining in UUO mouse model. by Wencheng Jin (13136262)

Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Changes in symptoms of insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness during the COVID-19 pandemic by age. by Hea Ree Park (10769827)

Subjects:

A) RT-qPCR analysis of <i>Yap</i>, <i>Taz</i>, and <i>Tead2</i> shows a significant decrease in transcript levels over postnatal stages from P0 to P28. by Heather L. Dingwall (14573796)

NLSs can significantly impact intranuclear stages of HIV-1 infection. by Nicholas Rohlfes (20577485)

Binary comparison matrix of increasing and decreasing trends in fire density from summer to autumn and comparison of different cases of spatial overlap of these spatial trends. by Peyman Karami (5909264)

Decreased childhood asthma hospitalizations linked to hotter, drier climate with lower wind speed in drylands by Klézio Silva Monte (20579829)

“…<p>Climate change poses a significant threat to human health. …”

Morphological changes in the testis and epididymis. by Cao Wang (1500691)

“…B & F) There were no significant changes in the Vit versus control rats. …”

Dynamical changes in the buffer population (<i>L</i> = 1023). by Ariel Burman (20329776)

Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Correlation between treatment-induced changes in lumbar motor control and N150 amplitude. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the interv... by Adriana Bittencourt Campaner (21175462)

Comparison between juvenile and adult demyelination. by Sara Hijazi (21656615)

“…Juvenile demyelination leads to impairment in PV interneuron maturation whereas adult demyelination induces a decrease in the excitability of PV interneurons. Summary data showing the averaged (± s.e.m) of the following intrinsic properties: (A) Resting membrane potential (RMP) (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, ****p < 0.0001, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001</i>), (B) Input resistance (IR) (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0024, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001</i>), (C) Sag (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0083, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01</i>), (D) Rheobase (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, p = 0.1230, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05</i>) and (E) Action potential (AP) threshold (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, *p = 0.0452, post-hoc LSD test: *p < 0.05</i>), (F) AP half-width (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, **p = 0.0058, post-hoc LSD test: **p < 0.01</i>), (G) Average action potential (AP) frequency in response to 0–650 pA current steps illustrating no significant change in S1 PV interneuron firing frequency following juvenile demyelination (<i>group x current two-way repeated measures: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group: F(39,1,291) = 2.487, ****p < 0.0001</i>) and (H) Maximum firing frequency per group (<i>ANOVA: n = 36,30,19,24 cells from 9/8/8/6 mice per group, ****p < 0.0001, post-hoc LSD test: ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001</i>). …”