Showing 981 - 1,000 results of 18,861 for search '(( significant changes decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 981
  2. 982
  3. 983
  4. 984
  5. 985

    A sample choice question with a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  6. 986
  7. 987
  8. 988
  9. 989

    Time course of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>In the recurrence group, BCVA (logMAR ± standard deviation) showed no significant change from baselines (0.37 ± 0.20) to 0.35 ± 0.23, 0.35 ± 0.18, 0.31 ± 0.23, 0.34 ± 0.26, 0.28 ± 0.30, and 0.24 ± 0.23 at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.45). …”
  10. 990
  11. 991

    Volitional control frequency and intensity in VH (Kapsner-Smith et al., 2025) by Mara R. Kapsner-Smith (22139315)

    Published 2025
    “…Singers produced significantly smaller mean smallest changes of both <i>F</i>0 and intensity than nonsingers.…”
  12. 992
  13. 993

    A sample choice question without a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  14. 994
  15. 995
  16. 996
  17. 997
  18. 998
  19. 999
  20. 1000

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”