Showing 21 - 40 results of 25,402 for search '(( significant changes point ) OR ( significant ((gap decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.56s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23

    Summary of the earliest time point for significant WD-induced changes in NASH-associated markers. by Melinda H. Spooner (6551933)

    Published 2023
    “…The figure illustrates the earliest time point for a significant change in the marker abundance and whether the marker <b>Increased</b> or <b>Decreased</b> in response to the WD. …”
  4. 24

    Four genes with significant changes at two different time points after kainate treatment. by Chen-Chi Wu (212810)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Four genes with significant changes at two different time points after kainate treatment.…”
  5. 25

    Results of change point analysis (Pettitt’s Test), where p ≤ 0.5 is significant. by Sarah A. Tominack (9395879)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Results of change point analysis (Pettitt’s Test), where p ≤ 0.5 is significant.…”
  6. 26

    Significant change point in the number of flooded houses per unit inundated residential area. by Lumin Hong (21533493)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Significant change point in the number of flooded houses per unit inundated residential area.…”
  7. 27

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  8. 28

    No significant changes in lymphocyte frequencies in the mandibular and deep cervical LNs following cervical SCI. by Antigona Ulndreaj (9585088)

    Published 2020
    “…Differences between the sham and cervical SCI group at each time point were assessed by Mann-Whitney tests, whereas time-dependent changes within each injury group were assessed by one-way ANOVA (sham) and Kruskal Wallis (cervical SCI) with Bonferroni or Mann-Whitney post-hoc tests respectively. * <i>p</i> < 0.05, ** <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01 (indicated <i>p</i> represent values from post-hoc tests), <i>N</i> = 5–7 (2 weeks); 4 (10 weeks); 4 (20 weeks) rats/ injury group, mean ± SEM.…”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36

    Fig 4 - by Katayoon Montazeri (18389243)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40

    Significant change point in the number of semi-damaged houses per unit inundated residential area. by Lumin Hong (21533493)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Significant change point in the number of semi-damaged houses per unit inundated residential area.…”