Search alternatives:
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
clusters increased » causes increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
significantly affect » significantly affected (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
clusters increased » causes increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search), confers increased (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
Number of significant genes and fold change.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/significance</p><p>Overall, integrating these results into our understanding of long-term programming by repeated infant pain experiences, the data suggest that pain experienced within a social context impacts infant neurobehavioral responses and initiates an altered developmental trajectory of pain and affect processing that diverges from experiencing pain alone.…”
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching > gender matching] during the Facial Affect Matching task at 12 wks compared to baseline.
Published 2019“…<p>Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching > gender matching] during the Facial Affect Matching task at 12 wks compared to baseline.…”
-
54
Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60