Search alternatives:
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared decreased » confirmed decreased (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared decreased » confirmed decreased (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
Published 2025“…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
-
6
-
7
Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width.
Published 2021“…The latencies of the CAP peaks did not exhibit any significant difference between different populations for all sound levels.…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Number of significant genes and fold change.
Published 2023“…Adult social behavior was decreased following Shock+mother pairings at both PN5-9 and PN10-14, whereas shock alone had no effect. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
17
-
18
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
19
-
20