Search alternatives:
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared diseases » complex disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared diseases » complex disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…This study aims to identify ferroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through bioinformatics analysis and to explore their roles in NAFLD. By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
2
-
3
Number of significant genes and fold change.
Published 2023“…Adult social behavior was decreased following Shock+mother pairings at both PN5-9 and PN10-14, whereas shock alone had no effect. …”
-
4
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
5
-
6
Data Extraction Sheet: A sheet that contains the data that we extracted from the included studies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Manhattan plot that shows the location of genes involved in folate, homocysteine, and transsulfuration pathways for which we observed, from hybrid analyses, a significantly decreased risk of obstructive heart defects when the risk variant was paternally-derived compared to maternally-derived, The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, USA, October 1997–August 2008 births.
Published 2021“…<p>Manhattan plot that shows the location of genes involved in folate, homocysteine, and transsulfuration pathways for which we observed, from hybrid analyses, a significantly decreased risk of obstructive heart defects when the risk variant was paternally-derived compared to maternally-derived, The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, USA, October 1997–August 2008 births.…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Statistical significance of mean clinical disease score when the control group is compared to an infection dose.
Published 2020“…<p>Statistically significant differences in mean clinical disease scores were compared by a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare the infection doses to the control group.…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Table2_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.DOCX
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”
-
18
Table1_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.DOCX
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”
-
19
Comparative analysis of SMI in two groups.
Published 2024“…It was found more frequently in males (42 out of 56; 75%) than in females (37 out of 61; 60.6%). Additionally, we observed a decrease in muscle mass (hidden sarcopenia) in 79.7% in patients with a normal BMI. …”
-
20
DataSheet1_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.PDF
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”