Search alternatives:
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared increase » marked increase (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant compared » significant component (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compared increase » marked increase (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration.
Published 2022“…Significant differences between starting bacterial concentrations within nozzle sizes are shown as: *: <i>p</i> < 0.05.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Validation of primary screen hits reveals compounds that recapitulate increased spheroid size (swell) or decreased MUC5AC in the lumen.
Published 2023“…Compounds that appeared to cause toxicity were identified by observing a significant decrease in spheroid counts in the swell readout or a significant decrease in the total nuclear intensity of the MUC5AC ratio readout. …”
-
9
-
10
Total tau levels are significantly decreased in the healthy older brains compared to the younger brains.
Published 2023“…Data represent mean ± SEM (A iii and B ii). An increased level of PHF1 immunoreactivity was observed in older brains of resected tissues although it was not significant (B iii).…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
19
-
20