Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant concern » significant economic (Expand Search)
concern decrease » content decreased (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant concern » significant economic (Expand Search)
concern decrease » content decreased (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …”
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
Numbers of stage 1 significant variants.
Published 2021“…Significance was assessed for both 1df interaction terms and 2df joint terms. …”
-
48
T-test results of the groups’ learning achievement delayed post-test scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
49
Summary of 4-way ANOVA statistical tests presenting results for the four main factors and any significant interactions between factors.
Published 2020“…<p>Summary of 4-way ANOVA statistical tests presenting results for the four main factors and any significant interactions between factors.…”
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
T-test Results of the groups’ self-directed learning skill post-test scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs.
Published 2024“…The −log<sub>10</sub> <i>p</i>-values (with further log<sub>10</sub> transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i><sub><i>Female</i></sub> (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Male</i></sub> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Diff</i></sub> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i><sub>1,<i>metaL</i></sub> (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i><sub>2,<i>metaQ</i></sub> (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”
-
58
Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs.
Published 2024“…The −log<sub>10</sub> <i>p</i>-values (with further log<sub>10</sub> transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i><sub><i>Female</i></sub> (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Male</i></sub> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Diff</i></sub> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i><sub>1,<i>metaL</i></sub> (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i><sub>2,<i>metaQ</i></sub> (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”
-
59
Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP.
Published 2024“…<p>Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP.…”
-
60