Showing 1 - 20 results of 59,734 for search '(( significant correlation scores ) OR ( significant effect decrease ))*', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Brain regions exhibiting significant positive correlations with IAT score. by Saeid Sadeghi (11707220)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>Brain regions exhibiting significant positive correlations with IAT score.</p>…”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Risk score significantly correlated KEGG (top 5) signaling pathway. by MaoMeng Wang (22177417)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Risk score significantly correlated KEGG (top 5) signaling pathway.…”
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Correlation and partial correlation between pre-pandemic trust score and change in trust score, controlling for age, sex, educational attainment, political attitude and religiosity... by Sofia Radrizzani (14833887)

    Published 2023
    “…Values below the diagonal are pairwise partial correlations controlling for the rest of variables. Values in bold are significant at P<0.05, N = 2039. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Correlation heatmap with significance. by Bo Dong (218172)

    Published 2025
    “…SHAP value analysis reveals that stable employment, higher education levels, and higher income are positively correlated with better health outcomes, while age was predominantly negatively correlated, indicating a detrimental effect on health status.…”
  19. 19

    <i>BZP4</i> expression differs significantly between genotypes. by Thomas J. C. Sauters (17382864)

    Published 2023
    “…Boxplots are colored by parental allele. Significance is determined by ANOVA. “**” p < 0.005; “***” p < 0.0005. …”
  20. 20

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”