Risk of bias assessment for eligible randomized controlled trials. حسب Junyin Pan (20700411)

الموضوعات:

Publication bias of the risk of all groups. حسب Juan Gu (288925)

"…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I² ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …"

Risk of bias assessment. حسب Eleftherios G. Kaklamanos (4268746)

Summary of risk of bias. حسب Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Risk of bias summary. حسب Manuela Llano-León (14599800)

Correlations between perceptual bias scores, age, and autism-associated features: Simple linear regression showing a significant correlation between elevated proprioceptive bias an... حسب Daniel E. Lidstone (21567523)

الموضوعات:

Quality assessment of the included 16 studies, based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool criteria (MMAT) [44]. حسب Brooke R. Brisbine (14197451)

الموضوعات:

The risks of bias in individual studies and the overall risk of bias. حسب Yuan-yuan WANG (19370071)

Risk of bias summary. حسب Manik Chhabra (10822587)

الموضوعات:

Risk of bias graph. حسب Manik Chhabra (10822587)

الموضوعات:

Study selection criteria. حسب Filip Stanicic (17808254)

الموضوعات:

PICOS criteria for the SLR. حسب Filip Stanicic (17808254)

الموضوعات:

PRISMA flow chart. حسب Filip Stanicic (17808254)

الموضوعات:

Risk of bias graph. حسب Yu Xiong (1478806)

Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. حسب Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

الموضوعات:

Risk of bias summary by article. حسب Manuela Llano-León (14599800)

Risk of bias assessment. حسب Carlos Ignacio Reyes-Farias (17480997)

Graph of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (A); Summary of the risk of bias for the included randomized controlled trials (B). حسب Zhuoyang Xia (21354186)

الموضوعات:

Funnel plot for publication bias. حسب Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis (12916598)

Risk of bias graph. حسب Ziyi Li (349831)

"…</p><p>Results</p><p>Nine RCTs with a total of 855 patients were included in this study, and all included RCTs had a low overall quality risk of bias and high quality of reported information. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the use of CT, CER (%) was significantly improved due to Danshen decoction combined with CT (MD = 3.95, 95% CI [2.58, 6.04], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEF (%) was significantly improved (MD = 5.46, 95% CI [5.32, 5.60], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVEDD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -5.27, 95% CI [-6.21, -4.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), LVESD (mm) was significantly reduced (MD = -4.60, 95% CI [-5.87, -3.32], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), BNP (pg/mL) was significantly reduced (MD = -88.61, 95% CI [-121.98, -55.24], <i>P</i> < 0.00001), NT-proBNP (pg/mL) was significantly decreased (SMD = -3.33, 95% CI [-5.92, -0.73], <i>P</i> = 0.01), hs-CRP (mg/L) was significantly decreased (MD = -2.73, 95% CI [-4.11, -1.34], <i>P</i> = 0.0001). …"